HomeOur PortfolioCurrent ProjectOur DesignsContact UsAbout UsGardening Blog

 

2010

2011

2012

Labels

Contributors

Toni Jux (225)

Shelf Life of a Show Garden

Posted by Toni Jux on Thursday 21st July

In my previous blog I shared my thoughts on this year’s Hampton Court entrants, from the point of view of a judge, based on skill and imagination. In retrospect, however, it begs the question of a garden’s purpose - should artistic merit overtake its function as a garden?

Many of the more esoteric beauties I, and thousands of others, witnessed could only serve as a sculpture in a modern garden, becoming a perpetual maintenance routine if one should wish to utilise the space. To this end I’ve reviewed my previous opinions and repealed most of them in response to the relatively short shelf life of these expensive investments. Unlike a gallery, the show garden doesn’t offer art to take home in a box and when a space is wrought with structures too high to sit on or too hard to bounce off, or a marble orb where could be a fountain, or the garden’s canvas leaves no room for a gallery floor, the practicality of these exhibits as usable spaces has to be put in question.

I’d like to start with one of the poets’ gardens as these, I found, were at least partially balanced between function and form. Wordsworth’s reimagining in Rural Architecture leaves a choice to its audience - that it may be exhibited or interacted with, and in doing so, pay homage to the words themselves.

However, its aesthetic merit is somewhat lack-lustre when considering its primary function - rustic and understated can be achieved without show garden price tags. Nothing differentiates it when held as an ornamental piece.

 

The Jabberwocky received a bit of a slating previously though, despite its fantasy origins, it stands as the most realistic among its neighbours - the confusion of design aspects I chastised, actually affords a balance between its festooning and practicality. It provides a safe and constructive leisure area at the cost of a confident appearance. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I spoke before of my being humbled in the face of Judith Cornford’s Eye of the Internet Maze and it has not been abated by time, including the weighty and meticulous design previously mentioned, but without any preconceptions is a very calming place to inhabit. The box hedges glide to the gardens epicentre and similarly the surrounding beds enforce the liquid structure of the space.

The World Vision Garden I felt would testify to a night viewing of the Palace gardens, its simplicity is astounding and as an installation piece it’s extremely effective. But nothing can grow, play or bear fruit on it and if it is taken at aesthetic, then it is successful but for the average gardener it has no life beyond Hampton Court.

Of this league, Vestra Wealth’s offering was my favourite. Designer Paul Martin here attempts to recreate the principals of architect Eileen Gray, hence the gardens name Gray’s Garden. A garden of muted colour, it relies instead on the static elements it houses. The design treats its empty space and lack of colour as another element and thus its emptiness seems mathematic, rather than wasteful, and despite this attention to detail it remains fairly low maintenance. The entire piece feels like a sturdy but beautiful piece of furniture, gorgeous to look at and simultaneously very comfortable to sit in. Judging a conceptual garden based on its practicality is something of a paradox and, as such, I’ll avoid it here, I would surmise that the concept garden cannot expect a domestic setting nor desires one, as then its message would be lost behind a garden fence. 

As such, it is more an indulgence on behalf of gardeners that they continue to frequent these shows each year, aside from the obvious gain in checking out the new products that the myriad of stalls have to offer, there is little practical value to the displays. They are merely inspirational pieces, as are the galleries to the new generation of artist.

 

 

 

By Josh Ellison

 

Hampton Court 2011

Posted by Toni Jux on Friday 15th July

A Wet Day in Wonderland

The events of last week were paramount on any gardener’s calendar as they marked the beginning of the Hampton Court Palace flower show and thus the world’s largest exhibition of designers, horticulturists and artists whose palette always began with the colour green. As such, I was dispatched last Friday to ascertain the inspiration behind this year’s themes, motifs and designs and also to assert my own opinion on which were most successful.

After a tumultuous, chaotic bus journey from Richmond I found myself at the gates of the palace, by midday already teeming with visitors. Having entered the show ground, I came to the poets’ gardens first, which were to set the standard for the rest of the day. There, six English scholars were paid homage and none more so than Lewis Carroll as, in an attempt to increase the marketability of gardening to children, the RHS held a competition to see which primary school could assemble the best Scarecrow. However, these field guards had to be renderings of the characters of Alice in Wonderland, thus encouraging an interest in classical literature whilst providing a constructive outlet to the participants of the competition.

 

 

 

 

Unfortunately the Carroll garden itself seemed somewhat less focused in its objective. Its construction appeared erratic and convoluted, unable to settle on a specific colour or material, the design including metal, woodwork, mirror and musical instruments. And while its synopsis suggested a therapeutic space in which troubled youngsters could rehabilitate (with the aid of musical stimulation), it lacked any real relevance to Carroll's Jabberwock, from which it was supposedly drawn.

 

 

 

 

 

The next exhibit of interest was an ode to Byron's love poem 'Love's Last Adieu', a fairly claustrophobic space I found, though this was to its credit. A wildly colourful outer sanctum supported by iron trellis and festooned with hanging baskets enclosed and shaded an urn fill with black blooms. The effect was decidedly morbid, however well constructed and I heard one show goer liken Ms. Mathews and the Co-operatives contribution to a mausoleum.

 

 

Next I spoke to designer Barry Chambers concerning his garden entitled 'On the Sea' and the steps from initial inspiration provided by Keats' eponymous poem. As the photo shows, it was an extremely impressive project whose ambitions included a 2 metre high artificial cliff face, which, in interview, Mr. Chambers revealed had been purpose sculpted from plaster and wire framing to emulate the setting of Keats' piece. However, the real ingenuity came from the subtler elements of the space as Barry revealed to me the purpose of his use of mirrors, wanting to widen the space visually if not physically, he aligned two mirrors to represent the sea’s horizon, complemented by an azure backing panel. 

My final look at the poets’ gardens, and my fondest, came from Jayne Thomas' rendering of Percy Shelley's ‘Mont Blanc’ and was named as such. I learned in a brief interview how Jayne had moved from ‘Mont Blanc’ the poem to the spectacular physicality she'd constructed.

“The Poem for me was about how Shelley saw and challenged the powers of creation... the raw, elemental power of nature and yet he saw the beauty.... I had a lot of resonance with the poem and for me, I went on a hike and came up with this lovely pattern of the Witches knot and I saw for myself that you could have a big, raw stone formation and then make it pretty.”

And lucky I was to secure her time as she revealed how busy she'd become in the months leading up to the flower show, and just how costly and rewarding her ambition had been.

“The rocks weigh in at nearly forty tons and I had those masoned to order... I've built this kind of rock jig saw... it's planted on three sides, with soft palliative colours so none of them clash and I'm very happy with the planting... I've had a lot of orders for elements of the garden, it appeals on the hard rock side to men and on the planting side to women, so it's like a happy marriage. People can have the strong elements with the pretty planting.”

 

After a quick lunch I swung over the Palace gardens' dividing bridge to check out the show gardens and found myself at first derisory, and then thrilled by my own lack of insight and the ingenuity of one Judith Cornford. Having no prior experience with figurative architecture, I immediately took her project ‘Eye of the Internet Maze’ at face value, a rather bland picture of the iconic eye of Big Brother. How wrong my interpretation was! After catching Judith, she passionately explained to me her reasoning and the clever minutiae that formed her project that I would have otherwise missed. The term ‘maze’ comes from her own experiences of discomfort and claustrophobia of the seemingly inescapable and simultaneously inaccessible digital playground. 

Touring the rear of the garden she explained how the font at its centre represented the fountain of information that remained illusive to those who are unfamiliar with its interface, and how this confusion is realised by the hedgerow pathway at whose entrance it is impossible to face the font directly.  Furthermore, a garland surrounds the water feature as a gift to the perseverance of those who make it there. So my initial observation was shattered and I really had to stand in awe of Cornford's attention to detail, more of which remains to be said.

 

 

 

 

Now, the ‘Naked Garden’ was a project about which I'd seen a lot of coverage, but I wasn't sure what to make of it. The impetus of this project, it seemed, was to expose the features of a plant that would be generally concealed. The method admittedly was ambitious, the use of large scale hydroponics in a show garden, however it seemed ill advised as this meant that the artificiality of the garden became unavoidable. One could see the pipes and irrigation systems that sustained the plants and the focus on synthetic symmetry was likewise undermined by the chaotic nature of plants themselves, whose shape abided no formula and whose murky waters seemed not in keeping with the clinical nature of the architecture which was all polished glass and ceramic. 

Let's talk concept. Seeming at first out of place in Hampton Courts riot of colour I stumbled across the barren plains of 'Enduring Freedom?' - a design by Nete Hoijlun and Corinne Sharp that focuses on the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan. Nete explained to me that the nature of her motivation behind this project stemmed from her own son's involvement in the war, due to conscription in her native Netherlands. Picture, if you will, a series of pillars of varying height, a dry beige wall dominates the foreground behind, and beyond that, desert. Along one side lies a poppy field. And thus the metaphor begins, each of the pillars represents the casualty number of a specific year in the conflict, and their height is respective to that number. You have the safety of statistics on one side of the wall, the danger of the battleground on the other, punctuated succinctly by the soldiers themselves, represented by the iconic poppy flower. But it goes deeper, for we can't forget the heroin trade that fuels the Afghan army, buys their munitions, thus poppies beget more poppies.

After crossing the Thai quarter and indulging in some of their cracking curry, I came to Anoushka Feiler's inverted ‘Eden’. Taken from the famous Hendrix jam, 'Excuse Me While I Kiss the Sky', it specialises in a similar sort of perception shift that he was known for. As you enter the space you'll be handed a square of mirror and you'll notice a whole mess of other mirrors too, curving around the perimeter, one large reflective sphere at the centre. You'll look around a little confused, then up and then down. A network of hanging pots comprises the upside down garden, I was fortunate that the weather picked up as I entered and I was able to appreciate her vision fully, the sky has become the lawn and the lawn has become insignificant. The whole area pays homage to the infinitely more vast space above it and thus the garden itself is enlarged.

All in all, a superb garden and a superb show, follow this blog for the coming debate, ‘Practicality vs Aesthetic’ - does the show garden have a life beyond the exhibition?

By Josh Ellison

 

Save Shadwell Park

Posted by Toni Jux on Wednesday 6th July

In one of my recent visits to the East End, a friend of mine, and a local resident to the Stepney end of Tower Hamlets, imparted some disturbing news. Those of you familiar with this area of London will readily recall the urban dominance of tower blocks and concrete and steel. Needless to say green spaces such as parks, are few and far between and the abundance of vertical living spaces affords few people the luxury of a garden.

 

I took time out to interview Roger Mills, a resident of the Pitsea estate, while I was there to get his thoughts on the rarity and subsequent value of such areas.

“Before we were relocated to the maisonette we didn't have a balcony let alone a garden, and it meant instead of spending an hour packing bags and the kids off to a local park they could step out the back door. The way these flats are built you'd need to ride the elevator ten floors just to see what the weather was like... And there's also the social aspect, we can pop our heads over and see people taking care of their gardens and smell their cooking, generally keep up with the community... So I'm really into inner city gardens but obviously they're impractical in large numbers.”

As Mr Mills suggests, when possessed of a garden yourself then the need for public spaces becomes less apparent, particularly for children, however he also makes clear that it is a fortunate family that finds themselves afforded such a space in the inner city. That is why it is critical to protect and keep those spaces publicly available to compensate for this deficit.

I've talked to death in previous articles about the various psychological and emotional detriments of not having a green area and so am now obliged to mention Shadwell Park a.k.a. King Edward VII memorial park. First opened in 1922, it has long served as a commemorative site for the King himself and also for a group of sailors lost to the Northern sea in their pursuit of India. Today it boasts one of the finest views of the river without climbing a set of stairs- a view currently under threat.

Until recently an initiative by Thames Water had selected this historical garden as the construction site for its new 'Super Sewer'. However, that plan was quickly batted down by local families with the support of Tower Hamlets council and the office of the Mayor of London. Unfortunately, this has not guaranteed the parks safety, as the subsidiary section of the plant, a forty five foot high ventilation shaft, still looks to be located at the front of the park. While part of the park may survive such changes, there are one hundred trees, a children's playground, children’s football pitch and the bandstand that earned the park's raucous reputation, would be lost.

 

Perhaps the greatest outrage amidst all this is that despite this being called an eco-friendly move designed to save the River Thames from the failing Victorian sewers, a flower meadow known to be host to the endangered stag beetle would be among the sections destroyed. And what can we do? The meeting date has passed unfortunately but history has shown us that outright protest has no allotted time or date, and if and when the bulldozers rear their heads it falls to us to stand firmly in front of them, to protect our parks and each other.

 

 

By Josh Ellison

 

 

Connect with Floral & Hardy:TwitterLinkedInFlickrShare/Bookmark